<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for I'm the Other Criminal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>"...but this man has done nothing wrong."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mark Driscoll: Sermon on Birth Control by Ann</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/mark-driscoll-sermon-on-birth-control/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Caitlin - 

You said...&quot;legalism isn’t being strident about a commandment.&quot;

But the dictionary says...

www.m-w.com (that&#039;s the dictionary online) 	

Legalism - Noun - 
Main Entry: le·gal·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈlē-gə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1928

1 : strict, literal, or excessive conformity to the law or to a religious or moral code 
2 : a legal term or rule



Just a suggestions to double check before jumping to conclusions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caitlin &#8211; </p>
<p>You said&#8230;&#8221;legalism isn’t being strident about a commandment.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the dictionary says&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.m-w.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.m-w.com</a> (that&#8217;s the dictionary online) 	</p>
<p>Legalism &#8211; Noun &#8211;<br />
Main Entry: le·gal·ism<br />
Pronunciation: \ˈlē-gə-ˌli-zəm\<br />
Function: noun<br />
Date: 1928</p>
<p>1 : strict, literal, or excessive conformity to the law or to a religious or moral code<br />
2 : a legal term or rule</p>
<p>Just a suggestions to double check before jumping to conclusions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mark Driscoll: Sermon on Birth Control by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/mark-driscoll-sermon-on-birth-control/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Thanks Caitlyn-Do you have a blog?
I guess I am just disappointed because I really like Marc and his teachings.  But I have seen the homeschooling issue come up again and again with him in negative ways.
I see homeschooling as being very similar to-stay at home parent or large families.  And I know  he has a large family and I would assume his wife stays home with the kids.  I just don&#039;t see homeschooling as being entirely legalistic.  Meaning that most of the families that I know homeschool do it because they were called to and want to be with their kids.  Not because they see it as the only way to educate your children.  I have met families like that but I wouldn&#039;t say that &quot;most&quot; are like that.
I know a lot of younger couples who really like Mark and his teachings.  I really appreciate what he has to say about sex in marriage.  But I am saddened by his continual use of homeschooling as an example of legalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Caitlyn-Do you have a blog?<br />
I guess I am just disappointed because I really like Marc and his teachings.  But I have seen the homeschooling issue come up again and again with him in negative ways.<br />
I see homeschooling as being very similar to-stay at home parent or large families.  And I know  he has a large family and I would assume his wife stays home with the kids.  I just don&#8217;t see homeschooling as being entirely legalistic.  Meaning that most of the families that I know homeschool do it because they were called to and want to be with their kids.  Not because they see it as the only way to educate your children.  I have met families like that but I wouldn&#8217;t say that &#8220;most&#8221; are like that.<br />
I know a lot of younger couples who really like Mark and his teachings.  I really appreciate what he has to say about sex in marriage.  But I am saddened by his continual use of homeschooling as an example of legalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mark Driscoll: Sermon on Birth Control by caitlin</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/mark-driscoll-sermon-on-birth-control/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-233</guid>
		<description>&quot;abstinencethecondom,&quot; protection of diseases isn&#039;t the issue he&#039;s addressing, so i&#039;m assuming that&#039;s why it wasn&#039;t brought up.  but if you&#039;re having sex only in marriage, perhaps you&#039;re willing to bear your partners disease (provided it&#039;s not life-threatening).

these are some great notes, but i have two major issues with it.

1), the most pro-choice OBGYN will tell you that the chances of you keeping a fertilized egg if you are on the pill are extremely slim.  the pill makes your body into a hostile environment that can&#039;t support a baby.  knowing that it&#039;s even a possibility and still using it is sinful!!  how can he say it&#039;s not?  christians should have convictions about this.  130 years ago, there was no denomination whatsoever that even used birth control.  one has to look at the reasons why it is so widely used and accepted.  when something in the church suddenly changes after 2000 years, you have to look at it.  in the case of the pill, you wouldn&#039;t fill your house with carbon monoxide knowing that most likely it would kill your kids, would you??  &quot;well, i don&#039;t know for sure that they&#039;ll die though; they might make it!&quot;  that&#039;s a stupid reason to do something, betting on the chance they will live. i&#039;m disappointed mark driscoll said that, because i like a lot of things about him.

2) the way he was throwing around the word &quot;legalism&quot; is dangerous.  i think, Michelle, he was using the home school example a lot in correlation with that word because he&#039;s had the experience of a lot of home schooling parents saying that it&#039;s the only right way to do school.  he is saying basically that legalism is when you declare something your conscience has weighed on you the truth for other people.  here&#039;s the problem with that.  first of all, the &quot;conscience&quot; is the holy spirit in believers on matters of faith and morals.  not some psychological process.  as believers, we SHOULD be sharing about matters we feel the holy spirit has convicted us of, especially as a result of the Word!  this is GOD&#039;s Word!  now i don&#039;t think you can tell someone straight across the board that they can&#039;t use any form of birth control, because it isn&#039;t totally substantiated by the bible.  but, it IS super important to check your reasons.  God&#039;s words in Genesis were a command that would bless us.
&quot;Command - instruction, directive, direction, commandment, injunction, decree, edict, demand, stipulation, requirement, exhortation, bidding, request.&quot;  if someone just plain doesn&#039;t want kids for selfish reasons, well why are we not wanting to call it sin?  sin almost always seems to come from not believing God about what he says is good and what he says is bad.  trying to do it our own way.  i&#039;m not saying everyone SHOULD have 13 kids, i&#039;m saying that people especially in the church ought to THINK more.  

legalism isn&#039;t being strident about a commandment.  it&#039;s an abuse or distortion of the law.  for a believer to tell another believer that it is not right ot take the pill is not legalistic!  i&#039;m surprised he would say that....and disappointed.  people love to talk about the great commission.  here is what they quote:
&quot;Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,&quot; but they leave off the end!  he wasn&#039;t done!  
&quot;and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.&quot;

we&#039;re not meant to not think, or not be taught!  we ought to LOVE God&#039;s law!  it was never an evil thing; it just wasn&#039;t meant to justify us or accomplish salvation! 
Psalms 40:8 I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.
it&#039;s not just an old testament thing...

&quot;Romans 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. &quot;

there are lots of super liberal churches that are ALSO legalistic.  you don&#039;t have to be fundamental or conservative to be legalistic, as mark made it seem.  super liberal churches are distorting God&#039;s law and misusing it just as much!  

...anyway, that&#039;s my 2 cents.  okay, 20 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;abstinencethecondom,&#8221; protection of diseases isn&#8217;t the issue he&#8217;s addressing, so i&#8217;m assuming that&#8217;s why it wasn&#8217;t brought up.  but if you&#8217;re having sex only in marriage, perhaps you&#8217;re willing to bear your partners disease (provided it&#8217;s not life-threatening).</p>
<p>these are some great notes, but i have two major issues with it.</p>
<p>1), the most pro-choice OBGYN will tell you that the chances of you keeping a fertilized egg if you are on the pill are extremely slim.  the pill makes your body into a hostile environment that can&#8217;t support a baby.  knowing that it&#8217;s even a possibility and still using it is sinful!!  how can he say it&#8217;s not?  christians should have convictions about this.  130 years ago, there was no denomination whatsoever that even used birth control.  one has to look at the reasons why it is so widely used and accepted.  when something in the church suddenly changes after 2000 years, you have to look at it.  in the case of the pill, you wouldn&#8217;t fill your house with carbon monoxide knowing that most likely it would kill your kids, would you??  &#8220;well, i don&#8217;t know for sure that they&#8217;ll die though; they might make it!&#8221;  that&#8217;s a stupid reason to do something, betting on the chance they will live. i&#8217;m disappointed mark driscoll said that, because i like a lot of things about him.</p>
<p>2) the way he was throwing around the word &#8220;legalism&#8221; is dangerous.  i think, Michelle, he was using the home school example a lot in correlation with that word because he&#8217;s had the experience of a lot of home schooling parents saying that it&#8217;s the only right way to do school.  he is saying basically that legalism is when you declare something your conscience has weighed on you the truth for other people.  here&#8217;s the problem with that.  first of all, the &#8220;conscience&#8221; is the holy spirit in believers on matters of faith and morals.  not some psychological process.  as believers, we SHOULD be sharing about matters we feel the holy spirit has convicted us of, especially as a result of the Word!  this is GOD&#8217;s Word!  now i don&#8217;t think you can tell someone straight across the board that they can&#8217;t use any form of birth control, because it isn&#8217;t totally substantiated by the bible.  but, it IS super important to check your reasons.  God&#8217;s words in Genesis were a command that would bless us.<br />
&#8220;Command &#8211; instruction, directive, direction, commandment, injunction, decree, edict, demand, stipulation, requirement, exhortation, bidding, request.&#8221;  if someone just plain doesn&#8217;t want kids for selfish reasons, well why are we not wanting to call it sin?  sin almost always seems to come from not believing God about what he says is good and what he says is bad.  trying to do it our own way.  i&#8217;m not saying everyone SHOULD have 13 kids, i&#8217;m saying that people especially in the church ought to THINK more.  </p>
<p>legalism isn&#8217;t being strident about a commandment.  it&#8217;s an abuse or distortion of the law.  for a believer to tell another believer that it is not right ot take the pill is not legalistic!  i&#8217;m surprised he would say that&#8230;.and disappointed.  people love to talk about the great commission.  here is what they quote:<br />
&#8220;Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,&#8221; but they leave off the end!  he wasn&#8217;t done!<br />
&#8220;and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.&#8221;</p>
<p>we&#8217;re not meant to not think, or not be taught!  we ought to LOVE God&#8217;s law!  it was never an evil thing; it just wasn&#8217;t meant to justify us or accomplish salvation!<br />
Psalms 40:8 I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.<br />
it&#8217;s not just an old testament thing&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Romans 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:<br />
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. &#8221;</p>
<p>there are lots of super liberal churches that are ALSO legalistic.  you don&#8217;t have to be fundamental or conservative to be legalistic, as mark made it seem.  super liberal churches are distorting God&#8217;s law and misusing it just as much!  </p>
<p>&#8230;anyway, that&#8217;s my 2 cents.  okay, 20 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mark Driscoll: Sermon on Birth Control by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/mark-driscoll-sermon-on-birth-control/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-232</guid>
		<description>This is a great blog and wonderful post.  You have made me think.  But I do have a question.  Why is homeschooling mentioned so many times related to this issue?  I do not see the correlation.  I know that there are homeschoolers that can be judgemental.  But there are parents who public school that do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great blog and wonderful post.  You have made me think.  But I do have a question.  Why is homeschooling mentioned so many times related to this issue?  I do not see the correlation.  I know that there are homeschoolers that can be judgemental.  But there are parents who public school that do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Insights from teaching by mundomoros</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/insights-from-teaching/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>mundomoros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/insights-from-teaching/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>I think Jesus would reply &quot;children are My weakness, because they let Me form them&quot; (http://tlig.org/en/messages/23/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jesus would reply &#8220;children are My weakness, because they let Me form them&#8221; (<a href="http://tlig.org/en/messages/23/" rel="nofollow">http://tlig.org/en/messages/23/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meditation John 19:30 &#8220;When He had received the drink, Jesus said, &#8216;It is finished.&#8217; With that, He bowed His head and gave up His spirit.&#8221; by Denny</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/meditation-john-1930-when-he-had-received-the-drink-jesus-said-it-is-finished-with-that-he-bowed-his-head-and-gave-up-his-spirit/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-227</guid>
		<description>I have a question for you.
What do you think of my new blog entry?

http://777denny.wordpress.com/

Thank you,
777denny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for you.<br />
What do you think of my new blog entry?</p>
<p><a href="http://777denny.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://777denny.wordpress.com/</a></p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
777denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exodus 24 and why I need Jesus&#8217; blood to be with God by Denny</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/exodus-24-and-why-i-need-jesus-blood-to-be-with-god/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I have a question for you.
What do you think of my new blog entry?

http://777denny.wordpress.com/

Thank you,
777denny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for you.<br />
What do you think of my new blog entry?</p>
<p><a href="http://777denny.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://777denny.wordpress.com/</a></p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
777denny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes from Tim Keller&#8217;s book _Prodigal God_ by Carol Remsburg</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/11/13/notes-from-tim-kellers-book-_prodigal-god_/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Remsburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=170#comment-225</guid>
		<description>trying to reach NanoWrimo -- this is your Municipal Liaison trying to reach you about setting your Home Region to MD, there was no response from the PM I sent you on the NanoWrimo site.

Please, please, PLEASE take a moment and do this now.

It&#039;s an easy, simple step, please affiliate your HOME REGION as Maryland.

It&#039;s easy to do, and what it does is make every word you write count for Maryland stats. While you may not think this is important, it really is. We want recognition for our work, our combined efforts. I won&#039;t tell you about last year, but suffice it to say because many didn&#039;t know, we came &quot;so close&quot; but no cigar, simply because the &quot;home region&quot; wasn&#039;t designated by so MANY!

So take a sec and do this:

On the top link bar notice the &quot;My NanoWriMo&quot; -- click it.

In your profile on the left you&#039;ll see another link -- &quot;Regions&quot; -- click it.

It will give you tabs -- &quot;Regions&quot; &quot;My Regions&quot; and finally on the right &quot;Home Region&quot;

Click HOME REGION

Select United States-Maryland 

Beneath it...click the bar that says SAVE HOME REGION

Bingo, you are done.

You will have my undying thanks for affliliating as every word counts, especially here in Maryland.

--- it was only because many in Maryland didn&#039;t take that one simple step that the Seattle &quot;Ducks&quot; smirked at us over the last two years after we won overall word count in 2005, which was a BIG DEAL. Come on, help me, help us bring that title back where it belongs to a small, but MIGHTY state, HOME to Maryland.

Come on, be proud, be a Mighty BLUE CRAB

Thanks in advance!

Carol (Tidewaterbound)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trying to reach NanoWrimo &#8212; this is your Municipal Liaison trying to reach you about setting your Home Region to MD, there was no response from the PM I sent you on the NanoWrimo site.</p>
<p>Please, please, PLEASE take a moment and do this now.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an easy, simple step, please affiliate your HOME REGION as Maryland.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to do, and what it does is make every word you write count for Maryland stats. While you may not think this is important, it really is. We want recognition for our work, our combined efforts. I won&#8217;t tell you about last year, but suffice it to say because many didn&#8217;t know, we came &#8220;so close&#8221; but no cigar, simply because the &#8220;home region&#8221; wasn&#8217;t designated by so MANY!</p>
<p>So take a sec and do this:</p>
<p>On the top link bar notice the &#8220;My NanoWriMo&#8221; &#8212; click it.</p>
<p>In your profile on the left you&#8217;ll see another link &#8212; &#8220;Regions&#8221; &#8212; click it.</p>
<p>It will give you tabs &#8212; &#8220;Regions&#8221; &#8220;My Regions&#8221; and finally on the right &#8220;Home Region&#8221;</p>
<p>Click HOME REGION</p>
<p>Select United States-Maryland </p>
<p>Beneath it&#8230;click the bar that says SAVE HOME REGION</p>
<p>Bingo, you are done.</p>
<p>You will have my undying thanks for affliliating as every word counts, especially here in Maryland.</p>
<p>&#8212; it was only because many in Maryland didn&#8217;t take that one simple step that the Seattle &#8220;Ducks&#8221; smirked at us over the last two years after we won overall word count in 2005, which was a BIG DEAL. Come on, help me, help us bring that title back where it belongs to a small, but MIGHTY state, HOME to Maryland.</p>
<p>Come on, be proud, be a Mighty BLUE CRAB</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
<p>Carol (Tidewaterbound)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sermon Notes &#8211; Tim Keller / David Bisgrove &#8211; “Practicing the Christian Life&#8211;Walking” Series &#8211; Sermon #4 by Mark</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/sermon-notes-tim-keller-david-bisgrove-%e2%80%9cpracticing-the-christian-life-walking%e2%80%9d-series-sermon-4/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the notes. Redeemer also put out a study guide for fellowship group leaders to use for discussions after each message in the series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the notes. Redeemer also put out a study guide for fellowship group leaders to use for discussions after each message in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infinitely patient &#8211; Exodus 3:14 God replied to Moses, &#8220;I AM WHO I AM. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: I AM has sent me to you.&#8221; by makarios</title>
		<link>http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/infinitely-patient-exodus-314-god-replied-to-moses-i-am-who-i-am-this-is-what-you-are-to-say-to-the-israelites-i-am-has-sent-me-to-you/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>makarios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theothercriminal.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-172</guid>
		<description>‘He didn’t want us to live forever in sin, but instead would have us die so that He might resurrect us again in a new creation.’

I’d never thought of it exactly like that before.  That’s good.

One of the ways that I know of God&#039;s patience is that He waited 30 years for me to bow before Him. I don&#039;t like to even wait 30 seconds for my children to decide if they&#039;re going to obey me. God bless - see you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘He didn’t want us to live forever in sin, but instead would have us die so that He might resurrect us again in a new creation.’</p>
<p>I’d never thought of it exactly like that before.  That’s good.</p>
<p>One of the ways that I know of God&#8217;s patience is that He waited 30 years for me to bow before Him. I don&#8217;t like to even wait 30 seconds for my children to decide if they&#8217;re going to obey me. God bless &#8211; see you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
