Paper Journal Temporarily Out of Order

November 15, 2009 by davestuartjr

My latest paper journal is nearly filled, yet I have some thoughts I want to get down while they’re fresh. My wife and I just came from Redeemer Presbyterian Church, our church, and had some stimulating discussions both before and after the service. Of note:

1. Matt approaches waiting tables with this mentality: I come in, I do my job, I don’t complain, I help where I can, I don’t itch to run out the door every shift, and I view my job as an opportunity to grow in Christ and serve. Because of this, he doesn’t hate it.

2. Though the movement of humanity towards cities right now and into the foreseeable future heralds what may be, as some have said, the finest and perhaps final hour of Christian missions (because so many of the nations are coming to cities, making it easier for Christians to reach all the nations), not all Christians are called to live in cities–just a lot of them. Tim Keller is big on cities, and today, preaching on Acts 8 in the final Renew campaign sermon on the gospel, hope, and the city, Tim graciously noted something like, “Jesus said all creatures must hear the gospel, so I’m not saying every Christian must be in cities–I’m just saying that the opportunity to minister the gospel to the world through cities is bigger than it’s ever been and that as a result many Christians are going to be called here.” This was a relief for my wife and I, who have been considering strongly the opportunities for ministering the gospel back in the much smaller city of Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Keep Thou my feet

April 8, 2009 by davestuartjr

Lead, kindly Light…

Keep thou my feet: I do not ask

to see the distant scene;

one step enough for me.

–Anonymous hymn-writer (I do not know the name; I read this quote in All Things are Possible through Prayer, by Charles L. Allen)

Blame

April 8, 2009 by davestuartjr

On whom to blame?

Satan, sin, and death:

Our choice,

our hearts,

our prize.

T. S. Eliot

April 6, 2009 by davestuartjr

“A condition of complete simplicity
(costing not less than everything).”

A couplet inspired by Crystal

April 6, 2009 by davestuartjr

Form: nature hath none fairer than this:
my sweet bride, whom I crave to kiss.

Pt. 2 A Severe Mercy, by Sheldon Vanauken

April 6, 2009 by davestuartjr

–Perhaps that morning she came back for me and then perhaps, astonishingly, found herself further along the Way. At all events, joy flowered between us, the joy that I had thought to be pagan joy. After all, for Christian and unbeliever, there is but one spring of joy. p. 150
–But what made [the painting] ultimately so moving and revealing was that Davy, in her divine humility, saw me called to a high destiny–the high door–and herself called to a low one. Making cookies for the students. Not counting the love poured out. That low door probably leads to a throne. p. 152
–Goodness and love are as real as their terrible opposites, and, in truth, far more real, though I say this mindful of the enormous evils like Nazi Germany. But love is the final reality; and anyone who does not understand this, be he writer or sage, is a man flawed in wisdom. p. 164
–If it isn’t just a meaningless form of words, I suppose my heart broke that night. It really means, though, loving past all measure. p. 169
–We had had what we had chosen, not business success or scholarly acclaim but a great love. And, under God, perhaps that love would save us…. But it was not to be. p. 172-3
–In writing to Lewis of my understanding of this astonishing phenomenon, I sued the analogy of reading a novel like David Copperfield that covers many years. In that book one follows the boy David running away to his Aunt Betsey Trotwood, the youth David loving Dora, the mature David with Agnes. While one reads, chapter by chapter, even as one lives one’s own life week by week, David is what he is at that particular point in the book’s time. But then, when one shuts the book at the end, all the Davids–small boy, youth, man–are equally close: and, indeed, are one. The whole David. One is then, with reference to the book’s created time, in an eternity, seeing it all in one’s own Now, even as God in His eternal Now sees the whole of history that was and is and will be. But if, as the result of death, I was now seeing the whole Davy at once, I was having a heavenly or eternal vision of her. Only, in heaven I would have not vision only but her–whole. p.185-6
–C. S. Lewis It is a Christian duty, as you know, for everyone to be as happy as he can. p. 189
–C. S. Lewis Of course [Christ] must often seem to us to be playing fast and loose with us. The adult must seem to mislead the child, and the Master the dog. They misread the signs. Their ignorance and their wishes twist everything. You are so sure you know what the promise promised! And the danger is that when what He means by ‘wind’ appears you will ignore it because it is not what you thought it would be–as He Himself was rejected because He was not like the Messiah the Jews had in mind. p. 191
–It is often said that both Heaven and Hell are retroactive, that all of one’s life will eventually be known to have been one or the other. p. 196
–The timelessness that seems to reside in the future or the past is an illusion…. The future dream charms us because of its timelessness; and I think most of the charm we see in the ‘good old days’ is no less an illusion of timelessness. p. 201
–Not only are we harried by time, we seem unable, despite a thousand generations, even to get used to it. We are always amazed at it–how fast it goes, how slowly it goes, how much of it is gone. Where, we cry, has the time gone? We aren’t adapted to it, not at home in it. If that is so, it may appear as a proof, or at least a powerful suggestion, that eternity exists and is our home. So it appeared to me. It appeared to me that Davy and I had longed for timelessness–eternity–all our days; and the longing coupled with my post-mortem vision of the total Davy whetted my appetite for heaven. Golden streets and compulsory harp lessons may lack appeal–but timelessness? And total persons? Heaven is, indeed, home. p. 203
–I attempted that spring something impossible: a sort of picture of what heaven might be… It is a heavenly afternoon. Davy and I have just had a timeless luncheon (I am assuming that God will not waste so joyous an invention as taste). I then say to her that I shall wander down to sit beneath the beech tree and contemplate the valley for awhile, but I shall be back soon. I do so. I contemplate the valley for some hours or some years–the words are meaningless here where foreverness is in the air. At all events, I contemplate it just as long as I feel like doing. Then I get up and start back, but I meet someone, C. S. Lewis, perhaps, and we sit on a bench and maybe have a pint of bitter and talk for an hour or several hours–until we have said all we have to say for now. And then I go gladly back to Davy. She, meanwhile, has played the celestial organ, an organ on which perhaps every note of a song can be head at the same time: that is, the song not played in time with half of it gone and half yet to be heard. She has played the organ for a few minutes and is just turning to greet me when I come in. Whether I was away for an hour or a hundred years, whether she has played for ten minutes or thirty, neither of us has waited or could wait for the other. For there simply is no time, no hours, no minutes, no sense of time passing. The ticking has stopped. It is eternity…. Of course it will not be like that. What it will be is quite beyond anything we can imagine. And yet it will be home. OF that we may be sure. I am as certain of timelessness to come as I am that time was the worst of the evils in Pandora’s box. p. 203-4
–If God is to be, in truth, sought first, He must be seen as heart’s desire. p. 211 (Mt 6:33)
–It would begin by my drifting away from God, only a little at first. But it is not how far; it is which direction. Away or towards. And in three years? Or ten? Time enough. And in the end, I should have come to hatred of God who had stolen my love though she still lived. The hatred of course would have been concealed as ceasing to believe. Nobody admits to hating God. p. 215

A Severe Mercy, by Sheldon Vanauken

April 6, 2009 by davestuartjr

–C. S. Lewis – I think there is a great deal to be said for having one’s deepest spiritual interest distinct from one’s ordinary duty as a student or professional man. St. Paul’s job was tent-making. When the two coincide I should have thought there was a danger lest the natural interest in one’s job and the pleasures of gratified ambition might be mistaken for spiritual progress and spiritual consolation; I think clergymen sometimes fall into this trap…. I’ve always been glad myself that Theology is not the thing I earn my living by. On the whole, I’d advise you to get on with your tent-making. The performance of a duty will probably teach you quite as much about God as academic Theology would do. Mind, I’m not certain: but that is the view I incline to. p. 105-106
–Another letter from C. S. Lewis – Look: the question is not whether we should bring God into our work or not. We certainly should and must: as MacDonald says ‘All that is not God is death.’ The question is whether we should simply (a.) Bring Him in in the dedication of our work to Him, in the integrity, diligence, and humility with which we do it or also (b.) Make His professed and explicit service our job. The A vocation rests on all men whether they know it or not; the B vocation only on those who are specially called to it. Each vocation has its peculiar dangers and peculiar rewards. Naturally, I can’t say which is yours. p. 106
–Christians reducing Faith to a mild theism. p. 128
–”gaily drinking… wine and discovering a Christ who was a blazing reality.” p. 131
–”…in his service was perfect freedom.” p. 133
–C. S. Lewis – My feeling about people in whose conversion I have been allowed to play a part is always mixed with awe and even fear: such as a boy might feel on first being allowed to fire a rifle. The disproportion between his puny finger on the trigger and thunder and lightning which follow is alarming.
–…I was doing enough. I did not, needless to say, ask myself what I meant by ‘enough’. Enough for what? p. 137
–I spoke on an earlier page of our love as like a fine watch that could be thrown off by a grain of dust. But this was not a grain of dust or even a mustard seed: it was the eternal God. After all, as C. S. Lewis had said, I was not finding the existence of a Master and a Judge ’simply pleasant’. My intellectual commitment to that Master was perfectly clear, as was Davy’s. And at Oxford it had all been challenging and beautiful and exciting. But now it seemed different. Duller. Davy was simply living up to her commitment, wherever it led. For me, that was the trouble: where it led. I was ready to play in a match, Christians v. Atheists. I was ready to level my lance and charge under the Cross of Gold. I was ready to follow the King into battle. But–Sunday school? Where was the glory? Poring over the Bible–when we could be reading poetry? Where was the army of the King with banners? Where was the cathedral, beautiful and holy? p. 138
–A strange and subtle betrayal, almost innocent. But not quite: corruption is never compulsory. p. 143
–Davy, meanwhile, was longing, a little pitifully, for me to find the joy she was finding in the Obedience: the joy that is perhaps the only perfect joy. p. 144
–Davy, whom I saw as far ahead of me on the Way as she saw Julian to be ahead of her, fell far short, in her own eyes, of the glory of God, as of course Julian, in his own eyes, fell short. To me, both were holy. The distance is infinity, and position is relative. Even I perhaps may have seemed holy to somebody. Some penitent villain. p. 145
–C. S. Lewis – It is a sweet duty, praying for our friends. I always feel as if I had had a brief meeting with you when I do so: perhaps it is a meeting, and the best kind. Pray for me to be made more charitable: we’re in the middle of a Faculty crisis which tempts me to hatred many times a day. p. 148
– C. S. Lewis, re: whether worthiness makes prayer more effective – The point is that worthiness might easily be taken into account tho’ not in the way of direct earning or reward. p. 148

Insights from teaching

January 16, 2009 by davestuartjr

I handed back a piece of writing to a girl yesterday, and I told her it had puzzled me for quite awhile sitting on my desk; it made no sense; I didn’t get it. In it, she said something like, “You need a comb. You need some lip gloss. You need it all, sweetheart.”

“I was mad at a girl, and her hair looked a mess,” Briana said.

“Oh,” I said, feeling the rest of the class getting rambunctious on the other side of the room. I started walking away, and, as I did, I said instinctively, “Well, I’m glad you wrote it out and got it out of your system.”

But then I was immediately hit by this thought: is that even true?

Where in Scripture does it tell us to let out our anger against others? Common perception seems to be that as long as we let our anger out in a non-hurtful way, it’s okay. But Jesus said, “that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire” (Matthew 5:22). So, in effect, modern psychology is dead wrong, and what I told Briana, and have told countless kids in the past–that it is better to write out your anger against someone than to say it to them or to bottle it up–is dead wrong against Scripture.

Time to teach a different tune–but what? Lord, I am ready for Your wisdom; let it come.

- – -

Today in Bible study, Brian asked if Jesus’ weakness is us. My first reaction was, yes, that’s exactly it.

Jesus, is Your weakness us?

Why did God take my wife and leave me with 3 kids?

January 11, 2009 by davestuartjr

Gerald asked us this during a visit tonight. I’ve never seen his heart before like tonight when we really talked about God for the first time. Before, they had politely listened as we mentioned Christ and God’s grace. But it came out tonight.

Don’t try to convert me again, he said. When did we try the first time? Was it our wedding? Certainly in our hearts we did want to convert him and Anne both. We’ve enjoyed them so much these past two years that we’d be idiots not to want to share glorious riches with them.

But tonight I received a firm reality check, and tonight I received an answer to our prayer in church today–that we’d have opportunity to go outside our comfort zones for our Lord.

So, in a thank you to Anne and Gerald, what to write? “We thoroughly enjoyed ourselves–the ever-abundant food, the discussion, and especially our brief talk of God. We won’t try to convert you if you don’t want us to, Gerald–we just want to be with you.”

Anne is more of a pluralist. She was raised to see the value and essential sameness of the world religions.

Gerald can’t understand why an all-loving God would allow a family to burn up in a fire or an earthquake to ravage an area. His anger at God for these injustices was piercing tonight.

Pierced. My heart is pierced. I feel like a fish impaled on a spear, flopping quietly, pathetically, in vain.

What do we do when someone asks us not to try to convert them?

3 Traits of Spirit-Filled Life (Tim Keller)

January 4, 2009 by davestuartjr

In one of his excellent marriage series of sermons, Tim Keller reviews three qualities of someone who is filled with the Spirit of God. I don’t want to forget them:
–able to receive criticism without being crushed
–able to give criticism without crushing
–able to forgive with no residual anger